I do not seek to opress art, simply to create observance upon the publishing of sciences and math.
You can change things from your end, it's just limited. That idea that you can not is force fed.
Some corporations will end up joining the new power, we will do a master move,
a new power inception that others will join. It will seem in error to everyone but the back work
will add up every time. Don't hire proofreader comedian dave, Dave don't change everything.
There's a lesson here, teachers say we must learn, I learned that from them. Read this and understand it, so we may all progress.
Everyone thinks they are a, they are not a proof reader I am. It came easy and hard to me.
Among mainstream common sence, the knowledge which destroys knowledge,
was destroyed exclusively. Proofreaders like I were scorned in all but a few levels of society.
Proof readers of math and physics, trim the code of creation methods.
Just listen, I looked at it all.
Reinstate the proofreaders, before they are all ruined,
as they ruin the ruiners.
Dave stop arting, here come the proof readers.
Why would that concern me? I know what I did wrong.
We need to trim the code on new releases of software and technology.
To eliminate the evidence of the factory's tools which we
should not release. As well as the origin software which we use to create all software.
If all science and math and minds, were ever released you would still have the experiments,
and the projects which are expenditures of time and work as well as resources.
Those projects create the products, the products can be released,
but the projects may not. North America has centers of new invention.
If there ever were an advantage in resources and talent in north america and europe,
then starting over on secrets would still be possible if we stop
giving over copies of the new means of production.
I did not want to give away that this was my direction in life. To stifle anyones' creativity in math and science. However we must start a new wave of gaurding trade secrets. A new course in every University should be started. The course of proof reading. Don't hate on this idea, but consider it.
What art does and says will always be unimportant no matter its' audience. Do not proof read them except when they hate. Proof read the maths and sciences I beg you.
The corporations do not want limits on their releases, they make so much money selling it all to everyone. Some will warm to the idea though. Rally round, you all.
Those that gaurd the sacred values of utilitarianism, of doing things because they are right must read this article. Do not resort to harm, but resort to friendly pressures and reminders of its' importance.
Close down places which seek to give away trade secrets, for they render the work of the next generations more difficault and accomplishments harder to achieve. Be mindful of this, I hope you are.
Thankyou.
By David Isaac Tripp
Dave,
Wow, a treatise on social exclusionism! On a poetry site.
As a functioning mathematician, I welcome any and all people to use my theories (whether they are North American/European or not), and enjoy the fact that my contemporaries (for the most part) see fit to share thiers as well.
Let's say, for instance, that in the twelfth century the Islamic mathematicians that created the decimal system kept it to themselves and the rest of the world still had to function on the Roman system (quickly, what's MMMCDCXVIII divided by CXLIII?), we'd be having a rough go of it in comparison.
Most of the algorithms we create these days have very specific functions and their usages cannot be transferred without rendering them new, anyway, so why not share them?
It is the job of the true scientist to expand the knowledge base of humankind--not to create product for productionary capitalists!
Knowledge should be communal (go ahead, brand me a communist) and used for the greater good of all who live on this planet!
WB.
P.S. (XXVI)